Visit lauracle007's column >>

LAURACLE007

Are you stalking me?...cuz that'd be great!
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 0; Links Seeded: 217
Member Since: 10/2006Last Seen: 11/22/2009

Study by the Journal of the American Medical Association is fatally flawed: Vitamins actually 'could shorten lifespan'.

advertisement

After reviewing dozens of previous studies regarding the use of antioxidant supplements such as vitamins A and E, and beta-carotene, a supplements industry expert said the Journal of the American Medical Association study was fatally flawed.

"Our findings contradict the findings of observational studies claiming that antioxidants improve health."

"Considering that 10% to 20% of the adult population in Europe and North America may consume the supplements, the public health consequences may be substantial."

They said there were several different explanations for this increase in risk - and suggested that knocking out 'free radicals' might actually interfere with a natural defence mechanism within the body.

Published to:

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
0.5
{"commentId":559453,"authorDomain":"lauracle007"}

This news reminds me of another interesting article I read earlier today called, The Science of Getting It Wrong: How to Deal with False Research Findings. To sum it up, a medical researcher is offering mathematical "proof" that most published research results are wrong.

we cannot assume that an intervention is necessarily safe in the absence of strong data testifying to this.

He proposes that researchers cooperate more with one another to confirm or deny findings rather than to publish research regarding new achievement and discoveries that could be overturned later. Meanwhile, doctors and health officials have to decide how to treat patients based on published research that could be overturned later.

{"commentId":559453,"threadId":"80714","contentId":"591609","authorDomain":"lauracle007"}
    Reply#1 - Wed Feb 28, 2007 5:33 PM EST
    {"canLink":false,"threadId":"80714","isPrivate":false}
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    {"threadId":"80714","contentId":"591609"}
    Start TrackingStart Tracking
    Stop TrackingStop Tracking